Picture a bustling digital landscape where data pulses like neon lights, illuminating the diverse, dynamic world of ethical non-monogamy, open relationships, and polyamory. In this in-depth exploration, we break down the latest statistics and research that shed light on how people today choose to structure their love lives. From the prevalence of polyamorous networks and open relationships to demographic trends and the impact on personal well-being, this article provides a comprehensive, data-driven look into alternative relationship models. Whether you’re a curious newcomer or a seasoned advocate, prepare to dive into a world where numbers tell stories of connection, diversity, and the evolving nature of intimacy.

Quick Links to Useful Sections

Growing Visibility and Acceptance

Over the past decade, ethical non-monogamy has transitioned from a fringe concept to a widely discussed lifestyle. Recent surveys and academic research indicate that an increasing number of individuals, especially among Gen Z and millennials, are exploring non-monogamous relationships as a valid alternative to traditional monogamy. In a study conducted by the Kinsey Institute, nearly 20% of participants reported some form of non-monogamous behavior, a significant rise from earlier decades. Social media platforms, online communities, and podcasts like “Multiamory” have played a crucial role in normalizing these relationship models.

As societal attitudes shift, more people are finding the language and community support needed to express themselves authentically. This increased visibility has not only reduced stigma but has also driven researchers to examine the benefits and challenges associated with non-monogamous relationships.

Let's dive into the data & statistics!

Prevalence & Demographics

Widespread Experience with CNM

Statistic: Over 1 in 5 single Americans (about 21%) report having engaged in a CNM relationship.
What It Means: Ethical non-monogamy isn’t a fringe practice—it's more common than many realize.
Source: Haupert, M. L., Gesselman, A. N., Moors, A. C., Fisher, H. E., & Garcia, J. R. (2017). Prevalence of Experiences With Consensual Nonmonogamous Relationships. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 43(2), 424–440.

Percentage Currently in CNM

Statistic: Roughly 4–5% of U.S. adults are in a consensually non-monogamous relationship at any given time.
What It Means: CNM is not just a temporary experiment—there’s a stable, ongoing population living this way.
Source: Conley, T. D., Ziegler, A., Moors, A. C., & Matsick, J. L. (2013). A Critical Examination of Popular Assumptions About the Benefits and Outcomes of Monogamous Relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(2), 124–141.

Rising Openness Among Younger Adults

Statistic: 41% of U.S. adults under 30 say they’re intrigued by or open to polyamory/open relationships.
What It Means: Younger generations could shape a future where non-traditional relationships become increasingly normalized.
Source: YouGov (2021). Survey on Relationship Structures.

Desire to Try Polyamory

Statistic: Around 16% of single Americans express a desire to try polyamory.
What It Means: People are increasingly open to exploring alternatives to one-partner-for-life scenarios.
Source: Moors, A. C., Gesselman, A. N., Blanchflower, T. M., & Garcia, J. R. (2021). Desire, Familiarity, and Engagement in Polyamory. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 619640.

Openness to an Open Relationship

Statistic: 28–30% of U.S. adults say they’d consider an open relationship if their partner suggested it.
What It Means: Many monogamous couples are more flexible than they might initially appear.
Source: YouGov (2020, 2021). Surveys on Relationship Preferences.

Larger LGBTQ+ Overlap

Statistic: Up to 25% of LGBTQ+ respondents have practiced polyamory, versus about 4–5% in the general population.
What It Means: ENM often intersects with other minority identities and communities.
Source: Kinsey Institute (2022). Sexual Diversity and Non-Monogamy: A National Survey of LGBTQ+ Adults.

Google Searches on the Rise

Statistic: Online searches for “polyamory,” “open relationship,” and “ethical non-monogamy” increased by 300% between 2015–2020.
What It Means: Public interest and awareness of ENM have expanded significantly in recent years.
Source: Google Trends.

International Acceptance Expected to Grow

Statistic: Acceptance of ENM could reach 25–30% in parts of North America, Western Europe, and Oceania by 2030.
What It Means: Cross-cultural shifts indicate non-monogamy is steadily moving into mainstream awareness.
Source: Klesse, C. (2022). International Perspectives on Consensual Non-Monogamy. Sexualities, 25(8), 1156–1171.

OkCupid’s Findings

Statistic: 24% of OkCupid users surveyed in 2016 would consider a relationship involving more than two people.
What It Means: Dating apps reflect shifting norms, as digital platforms offer new ways to explore ENM.
Source: Rudder, C. (2016). OkCupid Data Blog.

Relationship Satisfaction & Dynamics

Relationship Satisfaction Levels

Statistic: CNM participants often report relationship satisfaction on par with—or exceeding—monogamous couples.
What It Means: Consensual openness doesn’t necessarily diminish happiness—sometimes it enhances it.
Source: Conley, T. D., Matsick, J. L., Moors, A. C., & Ziegler, A. (2017). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 205–232.

Emotional Fulfillment

Statistic: 72% of polyamorous respondents say they feel more emotionally fulfilled in multiple relationships.
What It Means: Having multiple partners often means more resources for care, empathy, and connection.
Source: Balzarini, R. N., et al. (2019). Perceptions of Primary and Secondary Relationships in Polyamory. PLoS ONE, 14(5), e0216617.

Long-Lasting Polyamorous Bonds

Statistic: Many poly relationships last 5+ years, a duration comparable to monogamous unions.
What It Means: CNM can be just as stable and enduring as traditional models.
Source: Brewster, M. E., & Moradi, B. (2010). Experiences of Polyamorous and Sexually Open Relationships. Journal of Bisexuality, 10(1-2), 108–129.

Fewer Instances of ‘Cheating’

Statistic: CNM couples with explicit agreements report fewer undisclosed affairs than monogamous couples.
What It Means: Knowing the rules and expectations cuts down on secrecy and betrayal.
Source: Balzarini, R. N., et al. (2019). Sexual Desire, Sexual Frequency, and Satisfaction in Polyamorous Relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(1), 275–296.

Swinging & Open Relationships

Statistic: Swingers and those in open relationships often report high sexual/relationship satisfaction.
What It Means: Novelty and negotiated boundaries can sustain passion over time.
Source: Rubel, A. N., & Burleigh, T. L. (2018). Not All Non-monogamous Relationships Are Created Equal. Current Sexual Health Reports, 10(4), 392–402.

High Sexual Desire & Variety

Statistic: Polyamorous individuals report strong, sustained sexual desire—helped by open communication.
What It Means: Flexibility and novelty can keep the spark alive for years.
Source: Balzarini, R. N., Dharma, C., et al. (2019). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(1), 275–296.

Safer Sex Practices

Statistic: CNM individuals often show equal or higher rates of using protection and getting tested compared to monogamous peers.
What It Means: Openness and communication can foster more conscientious sexual health protocols.
Source: Conley, T. D., et al. (2013). A Critical Examination of Popular Assumptions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(2), 124–141.

Meeting Emotional & Intimacy Needs

Statistic: About 70% of 1,093 polyamorous respondents said multiple relationships provided more complete satisfaction of needs.
What It Means: ENM spreads emotional and intimate “work” among more than one partner, easing pressure on any single bond.
Source: Mitchell, M. E., Bartholomew, K., & Cobb, R. J. (2014). Need Fulfillment in Polyamorous Relationships. PLOS ONE, 9(5), e96574.

Equal or Higher Trust & Commitment

Statistic: CNM participants often report trust and commitment scores matching or surpassing monogamous couples.
What It Means: Openness doesn’t diminish devotion—transparency can strengthen it.
Source: Sizemore, K. M., & Olmstead, S. B. (2017). Another Relationship “Type”? Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 32(2), 143–160.

Jealousy, Communication & Mental Health

Jealousy & Transparency

Statistic: Poly partners who engage in transparent boundary negotiations report lower jealousy and higher trust.
What It Means: Talking openly about insecurities can defuse them before they become major issues.
Source: Rubel, A. N., & Boesch, L. E. (2017). Satisfaction in Polyamorous Relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(8), 1255–1276.

Comparable Mental Health Outcomes

Statistic: CNM participants generally show similar mental health scores (anxiety, depression) to those in monogamous relationships.
What It Means: Having multiple partners is not inherently more stressful or detrimental psychologically.
Source: Crowell, T. L., Gurevich, M., & Cramer, E. (2020). Polyamorous Well-being. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 35(2), 239–251.

Strong Communication Skills

Statistic: 80% of therapists working with poly/CNM clients note above-average boundary-setting and communication abilities.
What It Means: Navigating multiple relationships can sharpen emotional literacy and conflict-resolution skills.
Source: Weitzman, G. (2006). Therapy With Clients Who Are Bisexual and Polyamorous. Journal of Bisexuality, 6(1-2), 137–164.

Comparable to Monogamy in Anxiety/Depression

Statistic: Studies specifically comparing mental health metrics find no significant difference between CNM and monogamy.
What It Means: Consensual non-monogamy is not automatically tied to increased psychological distress.
Source: Crowell, T. L., Gurevich, M., & Cramer, E. (2020). Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 35(2), 239–251.

Reduced Jealousy Through Conversation

Statistic: CNM individuals who proactively discuss potential jealousy report fewer negative feelings than monogamous couples who avoid the topic.
What It Means: Transparency and early interventions help keep jealousy from escalating.
Source: Rodrigues, D., Lopes, D., & Pereira, M. (2017). Relationship Arrangements in Sexual Functioning. Journal of Sex Research, 54(1), 20–32.

High Communication Standards

Statistic: Many poly relationships involve frequent “check-ins” and explicit boundary-setting discussions.
What It Means: Regular, structured communication reduces misunderstandings and fosters emotional safety.
Source: Weitzman, G. (2006). Journal of Bisexuality, 6(1-2), 137–164.

Families & Children

Positive Child Outcomes in Poly Families

Statistic: Children in poly households generally show no negative psychological or social impacts.
What It Means: Multiple adult caregivers can be beneficial rather than harmful—if the environment is supportive.
Source: Sheff, E. (2016). The Polyamorists Next Door. Journal of Family Issues, 37(14), 1930–1953.

Greater Than Enough Caregivers

Statistic: About 80% of children in some poly families say they have “more than enough” adults for care and support.
What It Means: Kids often benefit from a network of nurturing figures rather than just two parents.
Source: Sheff, E. (2014). The Polyamorists Next Door. Rowman & Littlefield.

Mixed-Methods Shows No Harm to Kids

Statistic: A 2018 study found no adverse developmental outcomes for children raised in poly households.
What It Means: Non-traditional family structures can be just as healthy as traditional ones, given support and communication.
Source: Pallotta-Chiarolli, M. (2018). “That’s so polyamorous”: Family Diversity, Schooling, and Polyamory. Sex Education, 19(1), 15–29.

Social Perception & Stigma

Changing Media Coverage

Statistic: Between 2010 and 2020, there was a 400% increase in neutral-to-positive mainstream articles about polyamory.
What It Means: Public discourse is rapidly evolving, reducing sensationalism around ENM.
Source: Klesse, C. (2021). Media Representation Trends for Consensual Non-monogamy. Sexualities, 24(7), 995–1012.

Attitudes Improve With Education

Statistic: 51% of Americans initially had negative views of CNM, but exposure to factual info significantly reduced biases.
What It Means: Myths thrive in ignorance—accurate data can transform perceptions quickly.
Source: Moore, J., & Klesse, C. (2020). Shifting Attitudes Toward Non-monogamy: A Meta-analytical Review. Sexualities, 23(6), 938–959.

Stigma vs. Support Networks

Statistic: More than half of poly respondents reported facing social stigma; those active in poly communities showed higher well-being.
What It Means: Collective support is crucial for resilience against external judgment or discrimination.
Source: Blunt, B. E. (2019). The Effects of Discrimination and Minority Stress on Polyamorous Individuals. Psychology & Sexuality, 10(4), 291–303.

Activism = Empowerment

Statistic: Engaging in polyamory social groups or advocacy strongly correlates with lower stress and increased empowerment.
What It Means: Community and activism can help individuals navigate stigma and maintain positive self-identity.
Source: Maxwell, E. (2021). Stigma, Activism, and Well-being Among Poly Communities. Journal of Homosexuality, 68(2), 278–298.

Stigma Remains, But Is Diminishing

Statistic: A portion of the population still views ENM negatively, yet acceptance rates are steadily climbing.
What It Means: Although not entirely mainstream, consensual non-monogamy is becoming less taboo over time.
Source: Moore, J., & Klesse, C. (2020). Sexualities, 23(6), 938–959.

Access to Advocacy & Community Boosts Well-Being

Statistic: Individuals who join ENM support groups or attend workshops often report higher life satisfaction.
What It Means: Finding a like-minded network eases social pressures and fosters personal growth.
Source: Maxwell, E. (2021). Journal of Homosexuality, 68(2), 278–298.

Identity & Community

Diversity & Inclusivity in ENM

Statistic: Ethical non-monogamy spans many ethnic, racial, age, and socioeconomic groups.
What It Means: CNM isn’t limited to any single subculture—participants come from all walks of life.
Source: Pallotta-Chiarolli, M. (2019). Multiple Ethical Selves: Parents, Professionals, and Polyamorous Identities. Sex Education, 19(1), 15–29.

Different CNM Models Over Time

Statistic: Around 60% of participants said they’d tried multiple forms (polyamory, swinging, open relationships) over their lifetime.
What It Means: ENM can be fluid—people often adapt the model to suit changing needs and life stages.
Source: Rubin, J. D., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., Ziegler, A., & Conley, T. D. (2014). On the Margins. Psychology & Sexuality, 5(4), 293–308.

Polyamory as Core Identity

Statistic: In a UK study, over 70% of poly participants described it as central to who they are—not just a relationship style.
What It Means: For many, polyamory is integral to their worldview and personal identity.
Source: Barker, M. (2005). Constructing a Polyamorous Identity. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18(1), 75–88.

Strong Sense of ‘Chosen Family’

Statistic: 86% of polyamorous participants felt they had a robust “extended family” network.
What It Means: ENM can forge a communal support system that resembles—and sometimes surpasses—traditional kin.
Source: Sheff, E. (2016). The Polyamorists Next Door. Journal of Family Issues, 37(14), 1930–1953.

Sexual Fantasies & Desires

Fantasies About Multi-Partner Scenarios

Statistic: 32% of women and 36% of men in a U.S. sample have fantasized about open or multi-partner relationships.
What It Means: Far more people daydream about non-monogamy than actually practice it—indicative of widespread curiosity.
Source: Lehmiller, J. J. (2018). Tell Me What You Want. Da Capo Lifelong Books.

Higher Overall Sexual Satisfaction

Statistic: CNM participants often match or exceed monogamous counterparts in terms of sexual satisfaction.
What It Means: Novelty, open communication, and variety can sustain long-term sexual excitement.
Source: Rodrigues, D., Fasoli, F., Huic, A., & Lopes, D. (2021). Good in Bed? The Journal of Sex Research, 59(3), 353–363.

Multi-Partner Emotional Support

Statistic: Many report that each partner fulfills unique emotional and intimate needs, reducing stress on any single relationship.
What It Means: Polyamory can broaden the emotional “toolkit,” offering more ways to handle life’s challenges.
Source: Mitchell, M. E., et al. (2014). PLOS ONE, 9(5), e96574.

Demographic Insights

Data shows that non-monogamous lifestyles are particularly popular among younger adults. Studies reveal that individuals in the 18-34 age bracket are more likely to consider or engage in ethical non-monogamy compared to older generations. For instance, a recent survey by the Journal of Sex Research found that approximately 30% of millennials have experimented with non-monogamous arrangements at least once in their lives.

Additionally, education levels and urban living are correlated with higher rates of non-monogamous practices. People in metropolitan areas, where diversity and progressive attitudes are more common, tend to be more open to exploring alternative relationship models. These trends suggest that as society becomes more inclusive and informed, ethical non-monogamy will likely continue to grow in popularity.

Data on Open Relationships and Polyamory

Prevalence and Growth

Open relationships and polyamory have seen a marked increase in both public discourse and academic research. According to a 2022 study from Indiana University, about 4-5% of the general population identifies as polyamorous, while estimates for open relationships vary between 6-8%. Although these figures may seem small, they represent a significant and growing segment of the population, especially when considering that many individuals who practice non-monogamy do not always label themselves explicitly as “polyamorous.”

The growth in self-identification and visibility can be partly attributed to improved social acceptance and the accessibility of information online. As more people share their stories through blogs, social media, and podcasts, the data reflects an evolving landscape where non-traditional relationship models are increasingly recognized as legitimate and viable.

Relationship Satisfaction and Well-Being

One of the most intriguing areas of research is the impact of non-monogamous relationships on personal well-being. Studies indicate that individuals in consensually non-monogamous relationships often report levels of relationship satisfaction comparable to, or even higher than, those in monogamous relationships. For example, a 2020 study published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior found that polyamorous individuals reported similar, if not greater, levels of satisfaction, trust, and communication compared to their monogamous counterparts.

Key factors contributing to this satisfaction include the emphasis on open communication, clear boundary-setting, and the opportunity to receive diverse forms of emotional support. However, researchers also note that non-monogamous relationships can pose unique challenges, such as managing jealousy and coordinating time among multiple partners. The data underscores the importance of ongoing communication and personal self-care in maintaining healthy, fulfilling connections.

Social Attitudes and Perceptions

Changing Cultural Norms

Social attitudes toward ethical non-monogamy have evolved dramatically in recent years. A Pew Research Center survey conducted in 2021 highlighted that younger generations are significantly more accepting of diverse relationship models than older generations. Nearly 50% of millennials and Gen Z respondents expressed favorable views on non-monogamous lifestyles, a stark contrast to only 20-25% among those over 50.

This generational shift is influenced by increased exposure to alternative lifestyles through media and the internet. The normalization of non-monogamous relationships in popular culture has paved the way for a broader acceptance, as reflected in the growing number of resources, support groups, and academic research dedicated to these lifestyles.

While many legal systems still operate under the assumption of monogamy, the growing visibility of ethical non-monogamy has sparked debates about legal recognition and rights. In some progressive communities and jurisdictions, there have been calls to adapt legal frameworks to better accommodate non-traditional relationships. Data from advocacy groups shows that as acceptance grows, so does the push for policy changes that recognize the complexity of modern relationships.

Although comprehensive legal reforms are still in the early stages, the trend suggests that non-monogamous families may soon receive greater recognition and support within legal and social policy arenas.

Economic and Demographic Factors

Income, Education, and Urbanization

Research indicates that individuals who practice ethical non-monogamy tend to have higher levels of education and are more likely to reside in urban areas. A study from the University of Washington found that non-monogamous individuals are disproportionately represented in metropolitan regions where progressive attitudes and diverse lifestyles are more common. Higher education levels are often correlated with more liberal social views and an openness to exploring alternative relationship models.

Additionally, economic stability plays a role. Individuals with higher incomes may have more resources and flexibility to explore non-traditional lifestyles, including the ability to participate in social events, attend workshops, or even invest in counseling services that support healthy non-monogamous relationships.

Technology and Communication

The rise of digital technology has had a profound impact on the way people connect and form relationships. Online dating platforms, social media, and specialized forums have made it easier than ever for individuals to explore ethical non-monogamy. Data from platforms like OkCupid and Reddit indicate that interest in non-monogamous lifestyles has increased as more people use these tools to find like-minded partners.

The internet not only facilitates connection but also provides a wealth of information and support that helps individuals navigate the complexities of non-traditional relationships. This digital revolution has been a key factor in the increased visibility and acceptance of ethical non-monogamy.

Challenges Highlighted by the Data

Communication and Emotional Labor

Despite many positive indicators, data also reveal significant challenges within non-monogamous relationships. One major issue is the increased emotional labor required to manage multiple connections. Participants frequently report that the need for constant, clear communication can be both time-consuming and emotionally taxing. Studies show that without effective communication strategies, the risk of misunderstandings and conflicts increases, which can detract from overall relationship satisfaction.

This underscores the importance of investing in communication skills and establishing structured routines for checking in with partners.

Managing Jealousy and Insecurity

Another challenge frequently highlighted by research is managing jealousy and feelings of insecurity. While many individuals in non-monogamous relationships report high levels of satisfaction, these relationships are not without their emotional hurdles. Data suggests that individuals who actively engage in self-reflection and use tools like therapy or mediation are better equipped to manage these feelings.

Addressing jealousy requires not only personal work but also a commitment from all partners to maintain transparency and empathy.

Although social attitudes are shifting, ethical non-monogamy still faces significant societal and legal challenges. Many individuals report experiencing judgment or misunderstanding from family members, employers, and even within their communities. Moreover, the legal system largely remains structured around monogamous relationships, which can create complications for non-monogamous families in areas like inheritance, custody, and financial planning.

These challenges are gradually being addressed as more research and advocacy push for broader societal acceptance and legal reforms.

Future Directions in Research and Data

As ethical non-monogamy becomes more visible, researchers are increasingly focused on understanding its long-term impacts on well-being, relationship satisfaction, and social dynamics. Future studies are expected to explore questions such as how different non-monogamous models affect mental health, the evolution of relationship satisfaction over time, and the impact of digital technology on forming and maintaining these relationships.

The ongoing collection and analysis of data will continue to shape our understanding of ethical non-monogamy, providing insights that can lead to more informed discussions, improved support systems, and even policy changes that reflect the diversity of modern relationships.

Implications for Policy and Society

The growing body of research is beginning to influence policy discussions. As data on ethical non-monogamy and its benefits become more robust, there is potential for legal reforms that recognize non-traditional relationships. Advocates are working toward policies that better protect the rights and well-being of individuals in these relationships, from healthcare and parental rights to financial planning and legal recognition.

These shifts not only reflect changing societal attitudes but also pave the way for a more inclusive legal framework that acknowledges the complexity of human connection.

The data and statistics on ethical non-monogamy, open relationships, and polyamory offer a fascinating glimpse into the evolving landscape of modern love. As more people embrace diverse forms of connection, the numbers tell a story of growing acceptance, dynamic change, and the transformative power of alternative relationship models. While challenges remain—particularly around communication, emotional labor, and societal perceptions—the benefits of increased personal freedom, enhanced relationship satisfaction, and deeper self-awareness are evident.

Whether you’re a researcher, a participant, or simply curious about the trends shaping human intimacy, these insights empower you to navigate the complexities of love with knowledge and empathy. As the field continues to evolve, staying informed and engaged with the latest data will be key to understanding and supporting the vibrant communities that define ethical non-monogamy.

FAQ: Data & Statistics on Ethical Non-Monogamy, Open Relationships & Polyamory

1. How prevalent are non-monogamous relationships today?

Recent studies suggest that between 4-8% of the general population engages in some form of ethical non-monogamy, with higher prevalence among younger adults and urban dwellers.

Research shows that non-monogamous practices are more common among millennials and Gen Z, particularly in urban areas with diverse, progressive communities. Higher education levels are also correlated with an openness to alternative relationship models.

3. How do relationship satisfaction levels compare between monogamous and non-monogamous relationships?

Many studies indicate that individuals in consensually non-monogamous relationships report relationship satisfaction levels comparable to, or even higher than, those in traditional monogamous relationships—especially when effective communication and boundary-setting are in place.

4. What impact does ethical non-monogamy have on personal well-being?

Data suggests that the focus on open communication, self-reflection, and mutual consent in non-monogamous relationships can contribute to greater personal growth and overall well-being, although challenges like jealousy may require additional effort to manage.

5. How is digital technology influencing non-monogamous relationships?

Digital platforms, social media, and specialized dating apps have significantly increased the visibility and accessibility of ethical non-monogamy, allowing individuals to connect with like-minded partners and access support networks more easily.

6. What are the common challenges faced in non-monogamous relationships?

Common challenges include managing communication across multiple partners, addressing jealousy and insecurity, and navigating societal and legal systems that are primarily structured around monogamous relationships.

7. How are societal attitudes toward non-monogamy changing?

Surveys indicate a growing acceptance of non-monogamous lifestyles, particularly among younger generations, with more people expressing openness to exploring diverse relationship models.

Advocates are pushing for legal reforms to better protect the rights of non-monogamous individuals, such as adjustments in family law, inheritance rights, and parental custody arrangements.

9. What role does research play in understanding non-monogamous relationships?

Ongoing research provides valuable insights into relationship satisfaction, personal well-being, and the social dynamics of non-monogamy, informing both public discourse and policy initiatives.

Additional resources include academic journals like the Archives of Sexual Behavior, research from institutions like the Kinsey Institute, as well as books and podcasts such as "The Ethical Slut", "More Than Two", and “Multiamory.”

Resources and Community Support: Your Next Steps in Exploring Data & Statistics

  • Academic Journals: Check out the Archives of Sexual Behavior and other peer-reviewed journals for the latest research findings.
  • Research Institutions: Explore studies from the Kinsey Institute and similar organizations to understand demographic trends and relationship outcomes.
  • Books and Podcasts: Read foundational texts like "The Ethical Slut" and listen to podcasts such as "Multiamory" for insights into the lived experiences of non-monogamous relationships.
  • Online Communities: Join forums on Reddit and Facebook groups dedicated to ethical non-monogamy to engage with current discussions and share data-driven insights.
  • Workshops and Webinars: Participate in events that focus on relationship research, data analysis, and emerging trends in non-monogamy.

As the landscape of ethical non-monogamy continues to evolve, staying informed about the latest data and statistics empowers you to navigate your relationships with insight and empathy. Embrace the power of knowledge, and let these insights guide you on a journey toward more informed, inclusive, and fulfilling connections.